Breakthrough Bleeding And Double Bi

http://www.rezandovoy.org/

www From this you can hear the gospel every day, some songs and comments. This done by volunteers and the truth is that is fine

Milena Velba High Heels

Rawayanaland Love, Day 1.

Love Fashion Week from 23 to 27 March

Yesterday, March 23, 2011 Fashion Week began Love trade level Market Chacao, Caracas.

A nice initiative full of fashion, music and say that food, as it is brutal.

Although space is a bit small, could climb to the terrace to get some air and cool off in the best way: Buying. Brands like Guayabita
, Swing , among others, are giving their best pieces. Soon comes a well-rounded entry of all fresh and interesting things we have to see!

played the first day Viniloversus , brutal environment, sound, lights, everything. We touch a lot guts, with the songs of the two discs of groups.
The pictures were pretty good, we were surprised to have so many incredible pictures of Mangan (You know how hard it is to take pictures and go well?) Espérenlas will soon be on Flickr .

Viniloversus

Viniloversus

Viniloversus

not miss the super proposals cool designers to bring Venezuelan proposals seasoned with good music and a cool touch! Remember

follow us on Twitter, click here
Mua!

AireFresco.

Shaving Cream For Man

Mercadito de La Plaza. MARCH.

Last weekend, 12 and 13 March was held in the Plaza Alfredo Sadel, the March issue of The Square Mercadito. We are pleased to say that we could not attend due to personal reasons, but there was a pretty airefresco representative, who turned to the task of bringing in photographs a summary of what was this event that usually does not disappoint anyone.

Mites Idlers

Facebook: Mites Idlers

Nela Rios

Facebook: My portfolio Rivers

the Supply Designs

http://www.elabastodisenos.com

The puestico of @ vidaboheme

Vaudeville

facebook.com / vauvaudeville

paow

Facebook: paow

The Humanoids

YEAH!

Photo by: Paola Narvaez, airefresco correspondent.

kisses, Airefresco.

21st Male Birthday Cards

COUPLE OPEN AN INTERESTING WWW PAGE

Normal

gtbTranslateOnElementLoaded, (function () {var lib = null; was the check ready count = 0; function sends message (message, attrs) {var data = document.getElementById ("gtbTranslateElementCode"); for (var p in attrs) {data.removeAttribute (p);} for (var p in attrs) {if ("undefined"! = typeof attrs [i]) {data.setAttribute (p, attrs [i]);}} was evt = document.createEvent ("Events"); evt.initEvent (message, true , false); document.dispatchEvent (evt);} function checkLibReady () {var ready = lib.isAvailable (); if (ready) {Send message ("gtbTranslateLibReady", {"gtbTranslateError": false}); return;} f (check ready count + +> 5) {Send message ("gtbTranslateLibReady" {"GtbTranslateError": true}); return;} setTimeout (checkLibReady, 100);} gtbTranslateOnElementLoaded = function () {lib = google.translate.TranslateService ({}); send message ("{EVT_LOADED}", {}, [ ]), where data = document.getElementById ("gtbTranslateElementCode"); data.addEventListener ("gtbTranslate", onTranslateRequest, true); data.addEventListener ("gtbTranslateCheckReady", onCheckReady, true); data.addEventListener ("gtbTranslateRevert", onRevert , true); checkLibReady ();}; onCheckReady function () {var ready = lib.isAvailable (); send message ("gtbTranslateLibReady", {"gtbTranslateError":! ready});} function onTranslateRequest () {var data = document.getElementById ("gtbTranslateElementCode"); was orig = data.getAttribute ("gtbOriginalLang"); was target = data.getAttribute ("gtbTargetLang"); lib.translatePage (orig, target, onProgress) ;} function onProgress (progressions, opt_finished, opt_error) {SendMessage ("gtbTranslateOnProgress" {"gtbTranslateProgress" progressions, "gtbTranslateFinished" opt_finished, "gtbTranslateError" opt_error});} function onRevert () {lib.restore () ;}})(); (function () {var d = window, e = document; function f (b) {var a = e.getElementsByTagName ("head") [0]; a _loadJs (b) {var a = e.createElement ("script"); a.type = "text / javascript"; a.charset = "UTF-8"; a.src = b, f (a)} function _loadCss (b) {var a = e.createElement ("link"); a.type = "text / css"; a.rel = "stylesheet"; a.charset = "UTF-8"; a.href = b; f (a)} function _isNS (b) {b = b.split ("."); for (var a = d, c = 0; c

Praktica B Mount To Nikon Converter

JESUS \u200b\u200bOF NAZARETH PART INTERVIEW WITH JOSE LUIS

Interview with Bishop Julian Ruiz

on Vimeo . Huesca As I welcome the new bishop of Huesca and Jaca in order to fulfill the motto he

chose "to keep them alive"

Speedsuits Track And Field

Ladosis 14: Music Culture

Afternoon

but surely, here is the review of the special concert Panacea, Gaelic and Lebronch for the 14th edition of the journal Ladosis .

Sunday 27 February, a quiet day and different. A great atmosphere in the room Corp Banca bipolar ¨ ¨, relaxed and refreshed at a time. The issue has

mentees on its cover and content as always, incredible.

As for the concert, had tremendous atmosphere, each band played about 8 songs each. Fast but excellent.

Without much else to say, we photos of this event so cool and fresh, fresh!

Panacea

Panacea

Gaelic

Gaelic

Christian de Lebronch

Lebronch

Good evening, soon we will raise the rest of the photos to Flickr.

is dismissed

aireFresco.

Church Letter For New Member

OUR NEW BISHOP BERNARD NATHANSON

died

Bernard Nathanson / From "King of abortion" a pro-life doctor
By Verónica Toller.

A story that deserves to be. Nathanson revealed the recipe used to make abortion: making the media, falsifying statistics, to discredit the Catholic Church ignore the scientific evidence.
killed 75 thousand people, but was never arrested. On the contrary, the law allowed him, encouraged him and the parents of those killed was paid for it. "I had boats, aircraft, farms, women ... but it was all based on a lie," he wrote years later, he realized the extent of what he had done. "I am directly responsible for 75 000 deaths due to the lie that the person in the womb is not worth anything," he said. It was Dr. Bernard Nathanson, the "king of abortion, the doctor who did the legalization of abortion in America.

six days ago, died at age 84, already become one of the largest pro-life leaders of the world. Hers is a story of death and back to light, a proof that change is possible and a direct witness and courageous about which methods and manipulations to implant the abortion law. A model that after the American experience is being repeated in other countries where abortion is sought to be free, including our country. "As a scientist I do not think, I know and I know that human life begins at conception," he wrote in 1992. What did happen? It's a story worth knowing. Bernard Nathanson
killed 75 thousand people. And in death expected to have opened the gates of Heaven, and surely will have had, but not for having killed so many, but have acknowledged, have repented, have asked forgiveness and have started the opposite way of defending life and complaints against the industry of death. Why did I not been arrested? Simple. Because the deaths he caused (Nathanson acknowledged that oversaw more than 10 thousand, hand shape with about 5 thousand and in the clinic that he ran there were further 60 000) were and are in their country, America, very legal. We are talking about abortion. Abortion
number one: "I ran my own son," wrote

Nathanson was born into a Jewish family. His father was a well known gynecologist. He sent it to the McGill University Medical College in Montreal. "I My first experience with abortion in the School-wrote years later. My girlfriend got pregnant, and it seemed impossible to get married. My father gave me money for the abortion, illegal, which was complicated. She almost died. I took care, and social indignation filled me against abortion illegal. Years later, my other girlfriend got pregnant. She did not want an abortion but I persuaded her. I wanted the best abortion, and that was me: I did and so I ran my own son, coldly, without emotion, another surgical procedure to me, "he said.
In his autobiography "The hand of God," wrote on this episode: "I do not have feelings, beyond the feeling of accomplishment, pride in the experience." The mentality of the abortionist, he says, is "cold, without conscience, without remorse, perverting their medical skills, defiling his moral weight. It is seductive, with its quiet clinic, your professionalism in the act that comes closest to self-slaughter. "
in 1968 operably linked to Larry Lader, another supporter of abortion. Next to him created the League of National Action for the Right to Abortion. "We had success in two years managed to destroy the New York law that criminalized abortion since 1829-said Nathanson. But legal abortion was not enough: it should be "cheap, safe and humane" he said. The law was passed in New York in 1970 with the signing of then Republican Governor Nelson Rockefeller.
Nathanson was appointed director of the newly Center Sexual and Reproductive Health in Manhattan, the "largest abortion clinic in the western world" as he called it. The censorship, however, received several medical circles, he did resign in 1972 and filed as head of obstetrics at St. Luke's Hospital, where he also was performing abortions.
Change: the light that came from the hand of science When
understood that abortion was a crime? At the start of the new technology of ultrasound scans. "At that time we knew nothing of the fetus, we had no way to measure it, nor see, nor to confirm his humanity. Our interest is focused on women, not the baby, but when I left the clinic and was director of obstetrics at St. Luke Hospital in New York, something changed, "he said.
With the new technology "for the first time were able to study human beings in the womb and discovered that it was not different from us, ate, slept, drank fluids, dreaming, he sucked his thumb, Like a newborn child. The truth was that this was a human being with dignity given by God, that should not be destroyed or damaged, "said Nathanson. After 4 years of studying the fetus became pro-life doctor, "questioned the abortion with lectures and made two movies. In an abortion could be seen a real, a boy of 12 weeks sucked to death. He saw how she sucked his arms and legs, broke the chest, was very strong. Pro-abortionists say it was a hoax. I've always encouraged them that if they think so, make them their own real-abortion film, with its own images. Never have, because they know very well what would be. "
The way back home
Though to a Jewish school, his father made fun of religious teachings he received. "So I became an atheist Jew," he wrote. After the process of recognition of the reality of abortion, he fell into a deep malaise, a dark alley. For 7 years, spoke with a Catholic priest, Father C. John McCloskey, the Opus Dei. In 1994, he said he wanted to convert to the Catholic faith.
"In the early 80's I had money, property, warehouses, three failed marriages, a son upset and 75,000 victims -Narrated. He denied that there was another life, but knew he had. Depressed, thought of suicide. Then I met a priest "pro-life." He was my guide, my Virgil in Hell. I became convinced of the truth, the big lie that no longer dominated my life. Now my work "pro" out of the heart and soul, not just the brain. "
One of the things that struck him most was, he told a "rescue operation" a manifestation of pro-life Catholics against an abortion clinic. They sang and prayed. They had so much peace and dignity that he was pierced by Nathanson respect and wanted to be like them.
"Often there is the issue of abortion as a freedom of choice of women. But a person can not choose the taking of life to another. It is not possible to speak of the right to choose, because this is the commandment "Thou shalt not kill," he wrote.
was baptized in December 1996 by Cardinal John O'Connor in a private memorial service attended by some friends and family, St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York. He also received Confirmation and First Communion of the cardinal. About it, then said: "I found the cure to what was happening, fresh water in me, and soft voices and an indescribable feeling peace. He had found a safe place. "
"He was a prophet for life," Father McCloskey said in an interview published by the National Catholic Register. "He saw the whole culture of death is coming, and knew that abortion is just the tip of the iceberg."
"abortion is now so unimaginably huge monster that sounds ridiculous, thinking back to his cage. However, that is our charge. A Herculean task. I am among those who helped usher in an era of barbarism, "said Nathanson.
How to manipulate to get an abortion law
In 1992, Nathanson wrote a public letter testifying to what he had done and how, with other friends and colleagues, managed to bend wills and approve abortion. Revealing all this, and write the books he published and make the films he made, earned him criticism from his former friends and personal persecution. Nathanson must be courageous yet humble enough to do and say what did and said.
This is your open letter of 1992:
"I am directly responsible for 75,000 abortions, which pushes me to address the public possessing credibility on the subject.
I was one of the founders of the National Association for Repeal Abortion laws in the United States in 1968. Then an accurate survey would have established the fact that most Americans were against permissive abortion laws. However, after five years we get the Supreme Court legalized abortion in 1973. How did we do? It is important to know the tactics we use, because small differences were repeated with success in the Western world.
Our first major achievement was to provide ourselves with the media, they were convinced that favored a pro-abortion cause and knowing that advanced liberalism accurate survey would be defeated, to rig the polls invented and published in the media, according to them 60% of Americans favored the introduction of permissive abortion laws.
was the tactic of exalting their own falsehood and so we get sufficient support, based on false numbers on illegal abortions occurred annually in USA. This figure was 100,000 (hundred thousand) or so, but they repeatedly gave the media was 1,000,000 (one million). And a lie repeated enough, the public makes it true.
The number of women dying from illegal abortions every year between 200 and 250, but the figure continually repeated the media was 10,000 (ten thousand), and in spite of their falsity was accepted by many Americans convinced of the need to change the laws on abortion.
Another myth that we offered to the public, is that changing the laws only mean that the abortions performed illegally, would become legal. But the truth is that today, abortion is the primary means of birth control in the USA. And the annual number of abortions has increased by 1500 percent, 15 times more. fundamental
The second tactic was to play the card of anti-Catholicism.
systematic vilification of the Catholic Church, calling his reactionary social ideas, and attach to their nests the role of "evil" ruler of the permissive abortion opponents. We constantly emphasize. Means reiterated that opposition to abortion came from this system, not the Catholic people, and once again, fake polls "proved" and again that most Catholics wanted the reform of abortion laws.
And the drums of the media persuaded the American people that any opposition to abortion was rooted in the Catholic hierarchy and pro-abortion Catholics were smart and progressive. The fact that non-Catholic Christian groups, and even atheists, to declare themselves pro-life, was always muted. fundamental
The third tactic was to denigrate or ignore any scientific evidence that life begins at conception.
I am often asked what made me change. How I went from being a prominent abortionist to pro-life advocate? In 1973 I became Director of Obstetrics in a large hospital in the city of New York, and had to start a perinatal research unit, was the beginning of a new technology we now use every day to study the fetus in the womb. A typical pro-abortion argument is to argue the impossibility of defining when it starts the principle of life, affirming that this is a theological or philosophical, not scientific. fetology
But the evidence shows that life begins at conception and requires all the protection we enjoy any of us.
You might ask: So, why some doctors who know the fetology, discredit practicing abortions?
question of arithmetic: $ 300 each, one million five hundred fifty thousand (1,550,000) abortions in the United States, involving an industry that produces $ 500 million annually. Of these, most are in the pockets of doctors who perform abortion.
is a clear fact that voluntary abortion is a deliberate destruction of human life. It is an act of deadly violence. Must recognize that an unplanned pregnancy raises serious and difficult problems. But go to fix it a deliberate act of destruction is to prune the capacity of human resources and, in the social order, to subordinate the public good utilitarian response.
As a scientist I do not think, I know and I know that human life begins at conception. And although I am not a particular religion, I believe with all my heart that there is a deity who commands us to end forever this infinitely sad and shameful crime against humanity. "
(Note: for writing this article we have taken data published by Global News, National Catholic Register and The Reason fluvium.org).

Liquor Bars In Bermuda

Love in Latex, some cool photos.

Charliepapa

LaPiaPaez

Gustavo Casas

Rawayana

Airefresco

High Lymphocytes Pregnancy

Normal
JESUS \u200b\u200bAND

THE INQUISITION

Open Letter to José Antonio Pagola

"The

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

, originally called the Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition, has opened a case against the book '

Jesus. historical approach ', the Basque theologian Jose Antonio Pagola to establish if it complies with the doctrine of the Church, despite that the revised edition of the work, the ninth, leading the ' nulla osta "(no objection) and the Imprimatur of exobispo of San Sebastian, Juan María Uriarte ( Courier, 30/1/1911).

"The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith opened a case to José Antonio Pagola for his book on Jesus" (Religion Digital

, 01/30/1911).

Dear José Antonio:

First of all, I express my closeness, understanding and loving support, with the desire to help you sustain the confidence that, as you well know, was one of the characteristics of Jesus.

Supported in the same trust fund, I can not help feeling, however, now that I write, grief and sadness, sorrow for all that this situation could affect you painfully, sadly, because they do not understand these attitudes of suspicion, trial and condemnation of those who, although they claim to authority, followers of Jesus.

When it seemed that, finally, the meaning imposed elementary common-sanity, comes the news that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has decided to launch a process to your book. Poor

religion that needs an inquisitorial system to protect themselves! You can not surely be the religion of Jesus, but just the opposite, that of his executioners. In fact, he was the first victim of a similar institution.

1.

The gospel exposes the inquisitors

There is a text, as enlightening as forgotten, in the Gospel of Mark, in which this is evident. It reads:

"

entered [Jesus ] back into the synagogue and there was a man whose hand was withered. We were watching to see if it healed on the Sabbath, and thus have a reason to accuse him. Jesus said to the man with the withered hand: "Come here in the middle.

And they asked:

- What is allowed on the Sabbath: to do good or evil, to save life or to kill?

They remained silent. Looking at them with anger and grieved at their hardness of heart, said to the man

-Extends his hand.

He extended and his hand was restored.

As they left, the Pharisees conspired with the Herodians to plan how to kill it

"(Gospel of Mark from 3.1 to 6).

Espionage charges, twisted silence, conspiracy and death plans: What religion is that which promotes such attitudes, compared to an innocent man, which only recognize the importance of the human being above the law Saturday? However, for the religious authority that was "shocking."

know better than me that religious authority condemned Jesus, because they could not stand his attitude and his liberating message free issues "critical" to religion as the Sabbath law, traditions , ... standards of purity, could not tolerate his criticism of religious authority and the Jews "pious" it was shocking their solidarity with the outcasts and "sinners" and was radically challenged when Jesus uttered his denunciation of the temple ...

Any reader of the gospel, not about him in a routine, he is forced to wonder: What

could be, so much animosity and hostility towards Jesus by the religious authority? I have to me that the response includes two levels: the more apparent, the authority sought to defend "orthodoxy" and protect the received tradition, in the less visible, but perhaps more decisive, what appeared to actually move the authority was not simply the fear of being questioned . That is not to say an "evil" special priests, scribes and senators. Probably, they themselves were unaware of their ulterior motives and might even believe they were acting pursuant to the will of God. So, they came to cause the execution of Jesus, thinking that would give glory to God. But the reality was it was: if everything I (or ego) needs to be right and has no right to feel challenged, self

clothed with power, used to direct and control the consciousnesses to see himself as the "conscience" of individuals and of society does not tolerate any questioning of his doctrine. And if I, as well as being clothed with power, whether religious, you'll easily find a cloak of "divine justification" for all its actions.

2.

The Ego and his stratagems: the quest for power, fear of insecurity, the mechanism of justification and condemnation of dissent.

If we come to today, dear José Antonio, it seems that things have not changed much. Still met the laws of sociology and psychology ... and the selves (or egos) are running virtually the same as two thousand years ago.

religious authority also today said action to maintain and ensure orthodoxy received tradition ("to protect the faith of simple people.") And today it is possible to act in good faith, believing the will of God. But today also calls for a role of "lead consciousness," which prevents him from accepting free discussion and dissent.

In short, today as then, what is at stake is the power-in the broad sense of the word and its corresponding fear of losing, what I read as vital insecurity, "but all that is justify saying that it wants to prevent "scandal."

Did Jesus with their words and behaviors, not "shocked" to "simple people" of Galilee? Undoubtedly, to the extent that it brought him death, "but what is considered" scandal "in the eyes of religious authority, was actually released and life. Your book has been said that could hurt, but what people says is that it helps to believe and live.

sincerely suspect that what bothers the censors is that it can not hurt, but their interpretation is questioned. And that always leads to insecurity. Who has ideas on security can not tolerate anyone criticize them, not even the rewording of different.

Therefore, José Antonio, I get the impression that you repeat again, as with many others, what they did with the Master of Nazareth in that synagogue of Capernaum: spying, stalking, condemn ... with the only difference that now they do those who claim to follow Jesus.

But the reason is the same: the "doctrine" of the censors and inquisitors is questioned.

3.

When a language other sentence

have recourse to a simple picture. All humans, when we talk, we do a language necessarily in language. And nobody, except some fanatic, it occurs that a language is "superior" or "better" than another, they are simply different.

Similarly, whenever we think we do it necessarily in a "cultural language" that is, within a framework or through a filter: it is what is called a paradigm

.

And we can not understand and speak a language that is unknown to us, nor understand those who think within a paradigm that is unknown.

The reason lie

conviction lies precisely in this: he who speaks a language spoken condemnation different one, simply because I do not know. Moreover, because their language has found the truth, it makes disqualify any other language, not just as "different" but as "false." is the height of human arrogance, and rises to the inability to take away beliefs. In the background lies a vast uncertainty: this is precisely what leads to confusion, severe and dangerous, which makes taking their own "beliefs" (language) as being "the truth" (content).

This does not mean in any way, falling into relativism (Which, besides being intellectually untenable, leads to nihilism and suicide group). But the rejection of it can not be an excuse to assert dogmatic absolutism -as he usually does some religious authority-who maintains the pretense, as arrogant as wrong, to possess the truth.

Between the two, as unsustainable as dangerous in its consequences, is situated the "golden mean" which states that

human knowledge is always relative because, being located, has to necessarily a time and space. How well do we remember the verse of Machado!: "Do you really ? No, really. And come with me to seek; yours, keep her. "

Because ultimately, this is the pretentious falling deception in religious authority, over and over again:

taken as "truth" which is nothing but "their interpretation" . What this reveals is only one thing: who does it is in a mythic level of consciousness (which confused his "vision" with "truth" today we are forgetting something that is elemental: that all knowledge is already interpretation).

4.

When the Gospel is read in light of the Catechism

What I see in your book, appreciated and loved José Antonio, is just fidelity to the Gospel

, and wonder what makes other people smarter than me can see the exact opposite.

To that question, I have only one answer:

probably in all good faith, what happens is they read the gospel from the posterior catechism .

This catechism "so ingrained in the collective imagination Catholic and often too distant to the gospel-conditioning filter does reading. When there has been no serious study that can take away the "teachings" received, those are erected in the supreme and final judge of any theological approach.

That catechism-dominant until the middle of last century, theology was taught in seminaries at that time, which appear to rest your detractors, was formulated in a pre-modern paradigm and even on a mythic level of consciousness: we understand and say what he said and how he did! It was his "language" ...

The injustice is that they confused it was just a "language" with the ultimate truth. And so, when someone, out of loyalty, is led to "translate" the content to a new language, is quickly convicted and disqualified. And it warns of the inconsistency and injustice of condemning a "language" from another ...

But not only that: when reading the gospel from the catechism, or, which is, to read Jesus from religion, it loses its novelty, freshness and vitality.

The originality of Jesus tremendous paradox is watered by religious doctrine which he denounced . Can we ever stop using religion to tame the gospel? Will we have the courage to accept his new and consistent with it, even at the risk of falling our schemes "religious" our desire for security and the pursuit of power?

5.

Inquisitors "in Jesus' name?

I can understand the "laws" that operate in the mythic level of consciousness and psychological conditioning and deceit arising from identification with the self (or ego) of which we have been (or we are). However, I see that

produces sadness among those who call themselves followers of Jesus use practices characteristic of those who persecuted him and ended up running it .

How can you, on behalf of Jesus, the great critic of religion and in particular, religious authority, "assume attitudes of trial and conviction?

Can anyone imagine the Master of Nazareth condemning people for their ideas? In the Gospel, only one thing Jesus condemned: the hypocrisy of authority, particularly when used to impose on people.

No, Jesus was not divine, and came to make "believers." Wanted, nothing more and nothing less, that make us a little more "human"

sought help us "see" . But this is precisely what an authoritarian mindset can not allow: to her, everything has to remain "as it always has been."

The conclusion arrived at by any reader "neutral" of the gospel seems clear: Jesus would return

today also to be condemned by religious authority (although it is called "Christian"). The practice of the Nazarene, so forgotten in circles "religious" - proclaims a radically subversive: in a conflict between convicted and sentenced, Jesus is always find the latter part of . This leads me to believe that an "inquisitorial" can be very "religious" even very "Catholic" non-Christian but .

conclusion ... maintain confidence and avoid the pitfalls of self

Dear Jose Antonio: I know you're a good man and faithful coherent, integrated and delivered, like Jesus.

Let me end with a call to maintain confidence and an invitation, which I do myself, while the desire for you.

Be confident ... and lean on it. Your ego may suffer with this situation, the more absurd and hurtful because it comes from those who call themselves followers of Jesus, but

who you are not affected by anything from her . What we really are is safe from swing. So, breathe deeply, look at the present moment ... and taking away: both the "noise" that can llegarte outside in the form of condemnation, as the self that easily leads us into the confusion and suffering.

And the invitation:

every crisis is opportunity growth. If we live well, the "core" of all pain is strength and life. So I think that we invited to transcend the self, his "games" and its pitfalls . We are infinitely more than he does, ours is a "shared identity", in which we find Jesus himself, who are non-separated. Because, beyond the apparent (false) separation sets the mind, you and I, you and those who harass and condemn you, Jesus, and we, we and all beings are ... No-two.

In this "shared drive" or Non-duality no separation, no distance, gets a hug decided

agra and affectionate,

Enrique Martinez Lozano